|
This Exemplar illustrates the value of initiatives such as LearnScope and
Flexible Learning as catalysts of changing mindsets and practices about
training and learning.
|
| |
| Melissa Mills |
mgmills@doh.health.nsw.gov.au |
Tamworth |
Course area: Health Worker Training
I work for Learning Services in New England Area Health Service, which is one of
18 units that make up the NSW Health Registered Training Organisation. Up until
two years ago, all of our training was face-to-face.
We offer a range of accredited qualifications—for example, training and assessment;
aged care; project management; and frontline management for health staff and
workers from other agencies e.g., Local Council, HACC. Our unit is also
responsible for addressing other organisational learning needs, including first aid,
fire and security.
We’re the only unit in NSW Health RTO with a substantial involvement in
flexible delivery. A typical course we run starts off with a half-day face-to-face
orientation. We’ve tried doing this session by video for candidates who cannot
attend in person, but it doesn’t work. It is better to get everyone together. If people
are not used to learning online, we show them what to do during the introductory
session.
What happens after that depends on learner needs, skill levels (prior learning is
formally assessed) and the course. If someone needs help, we give it over the phone.
Learners also have on-screen instructions that provide guidance.
We give people various resources to support their online learning. Some of them
can be downloaded from the intranet, others are distributed by CD. Where they’re
available, we use the ANTA Toolboxes, and put them on CD. For people who are
not computer-literate, we also give out print copies of the material they need.
In a typical course, every month or two there is a face-to-face session, perhaps for a
few hours. At the moment, we’re assessing whether we could use videoconferencing
for these face-to-face sessions during the course.
What you end up with in most of our courses is a mix of face-to-face and distance
materials—online, CD, videoconference, and print. We also use a software program
called Discus [www.discusware.com] to support asynchronous discussion groups with
people studying for the same qualification. It works best when it is managed
properly, and there is a reason for the discussion. Otherwise, you can run into
problems with lack of structure. The online discussion can become just a meeting
place.
In a lot of cases, the people who live in one town studying a course will get together.
We don’t organise it, the groups are self-starting and self-supporting.
The catalyst for us to go down the online track was a LearnScope project which I
was involved in during 2002. You can use something like that as a driver of change.
The project gives you the excuse, so you can say ‘we’ve got to have X completed,
because it is a condition of our funding’. The culture here is very difficult to change,
so the LearnScope project helped a lot.
Over the last few years, we’ve trained a lot of trainers. In the New England region
alone, we have several hundred accredited trainers and assessors. One of our
priorities for the future is to harness these people, so that they’re more directly
involved in the training of others.
Another change that will happen in the near future will be the more widespread
availability of broadband. Once that is in place, I expect us to make more use of
videoconference, and for people to make more use of our internet site rather than
using CD.