|
This Exemplar illustrates the value of flexibility and a 'can do' attitude in
finding ways around problems.
|
| |
| Margaret Spears |
margaret.spears@tafensw.edu.au |
TAFE NSW - North Coast Institute |
Course area: Children’s Services
A few years ago, I became aware that there are quite a few people who can’t do
Diploma-level study in child care because they don’t have the Higher School
Certificate. Even if you’re mature-aged, you still need a Cert III to get into the
Diploma. That’s fine if you can study at TAFE full-time for six months! But there
are a lot of people who can’t manage full-time study, but want to do the Diploma.
So we set about running a course in child care, at Cert III level, to cater to this
group.
The students we were targeting may be at different stages. Some are school leavers
who have dropped out in Year 9; some are mature-age and may be studying for the
first time in decades.
However, they have a lot in common. They tend to have had little or no exposure
to computers. Even the young ones may have left school without using computers.
We’ve also found that they have difficulty with ‘academic speak’. You give them an
assignment question, and they may have trouble understanding what you’re after.
They often don’t know how to set out an assignment or how to manage study time.
Overall, they’re very high maintenance, and need a lot of jollying along, a lot of
support and input.
Then there is the issue of self-esteem. They change a lot when they go through a
Certificate III. When they finish, it’s ‘Wow, I’ve done this!!’ They’ve blossomed.
They can express themselves, they feel validated. But to get to that point, they need
a lot of support, and you need to give them options. So we designed a course that
would cater to their needs and, at the same time, give them the support they need.
We decided to give them written packages, developed by TAFE NSW. In addition,
they get copies of the ANTA Toolboxes on CD. These link with the Janison
Toolbox, so we can keep track of what students are doing. Some of them like the
Toolboxes, others don’t.
We’ve tried to create a supportive environment in a number of ways. We’ve only
got a small core of teachers, which we’ve found works better. If you have too many
teachers on a course like this, the students get confused, they don’t know who is
looking after what subject.
One catalyst for the course changes was $3000 to field-trial the ANTA Toolbox in
child care. Having received the funding, we were obliged to trial the materials, and
that resulted in more planning and review. Every week, I’d meet with the other two
staff to review the issues and lessons, including the material on the Toolbox.
We wanted the program to be flexible. However, we also recognised that if it was
completely self-directed, it would not work. So we put a lot of thought into how to
include face-to-face contact.
There were two main components. The first was a day-long Saturday workshop each
month. Each of the teaching staff spent time presenting to the group at each
workshop.
The second face-to-face component was what we promoted as a ‘drop-in session’,
one evening each week. We ran this upstairs in our learning centre. The centre has
computers, a telephone, TV and video, and work tables. On the night of the dropin,
we’d station one teacher upstairs in the learning centre, although she could
always phone down for backup if she needed another teacher’s help. Sometimes,
things would get very busy upstairs, but more commonly, a group of perhaps five or
six regular students would meet and work through the materials.
The other two teachers would be stationed downstairs, taking calls. We always log
these calls, so we have a record of who is staying in touch and what is causing
difficulties. Wednesday evening has always been the night students can get help by
phone. Actually, it is best if, right at the beginning of the course, you let them know
that ‘...if you’re going to do this course, you need to be available on Wednesday
nights.’