Visual art influences and techniques
Although in the gallery scenes in Luke's
way of looking, and in the character Luke's own
paintings, there are many different styles of art represented,
there are no direct references to any existing works
of art or artists' styles. For me to have directly copied
particular paintings, or used specifically recognisable
styles, would have been an infringement of copyright
law (even the images of works of long dead artists belong
to the estates of those artists, despite legal ownership
of the paintings themselves). Hodder, the publisher,
looked into the matter before we began the book and it
was all looking very complicated, so we decided that
the best approach was for me to make oblique references
only to various artistic styles. Because of the copyright
issue, I haven't appropriated style or technique anywhere;
instead I've taken some of the ideas behind various artists' work,
and explored these. In the following analysis, where
ever I don't list any particular artists or styles in
reference to images in the book, it's because there were
no specific artists or styles I was being inspired by;
my paintings could be reminiscent of any number of styles
or periods of art.
The character Luke's first painting - the portrait on page 6 - is a reference
to the Cubists, particularly Braque and Picasso, and their ideas of rearranging
different planes of perspective into the one plane. (For example, here we see
both eyes and ears, which from a side on view would not normally be possible.)
Luke's painting was done in coloured pencil. The rest of this spread has been
done in pen and ink, with a watercolour wash over the finished work, as has
the previous one. I used a permanent black marker for the solid black on Mr
Barraclough. Some of the outlines are smudged with graphite to give an etched
look. (I have used this technique throughout the pen drawn spreads).
Luke's
apple on page 7 was painted with gouache.
The swirling
clouds in Luke's painting on page 9 are reminiscent
of the way Vincent van Gogh drew clouds. There is also a
hint at the Surrealists in the way he has drawn the clock
tower. I painted his painting with gouache, watercolour,
and Texta. The colour on Luke himself, is watercolour.
There is a hint at the way the Renaissance sculptors composed
their work in the huge three-figure piece in front of the
art gallery on page 12. I took
as my inspiration a work by Bologna, called 'The Rape of the Sabine'. My piece,
of course, is not about such a dark subject. The doorway of the gallery has
been filled in with Texta, and the colours spilling down the steps are crayon.
The artwork
comprising the toaster, kettle and toast rack on the following
page, has no influences - entirely my invention,
though it could be seen as a reference to the many 'found
object' styles which are presently practiced, and go back
to the Dadaists. The 'Clarra Bough' piece again makes reference
to the Cubists, although the drawing styles of the arm and
bird in that painting are a nod in the direction of Brett
Whitely. I used Texta and crayon in that work, as these combine
to give the look of the oil paint texture often employed
by the Cubists. I have, however, used stronger colours than
they used to tie the work in with the late 20th century (ie
Brett Whitely). The other painting on that same spread, which
has been done with acrylic paint, has a number of references
to different works by Matisse. The colour of the apples in
this work reflect Luke's own painting seen on page 7. Apart
from the pen and ink, I have used watercolour and gouache
on the rest of this spread.
On the
next page ('Luke wondered what Mr B would say...'),
the painting immediately behind Luke, which I painted in
oil paint, is in a Surrealist style - no one in particular,
though Dali comes to mind. There is a Jackson Pollock inspired
work, painted with acrylic paint and crayon, beyond the piano
piece, which is painted with acrylics. The painting, which
sits in the gutter of the spread, has been done with coloured
pencil, and the little oval one above it, in watercolour.
In the corners of the room are some sculptures reminiscent
of Michelangelo's slaves. The woman playing the lute is inspired
by the 17th century Dutch painter Vermeer, and has been done
with gouache, as has the work above it. The work beyond the
minotaur on the far right is inspired by a Mondrian work,
and was painted in oil paints (one of the points of genesis
for this whole book was a discussion I had with Nadia in
which I expressed how much I had been taken by a short story
of hers called Listening to Mondrian, from the collection, The
night Tolkien died [Random House, 1994]. That's one reason
I put that painting in there). The nude is gouache; the minotaur
is acrylic, as are the spheres, hand sculpture, and rays
of light. All the rest has been done with watercolour.

We know where the painting on the wall behind the counter
in the kiosk scene (page 19) comes from, no copyright issues
there. There are no particular other influences in this spread.
The whole picture has been painted with oil paint.
The next spread (pages 20, 21) is also oil paint, though
there is some crayon in the painting which Luke is touching.
The work in the foreground has been inspired by the work
of Christo (the guy who wraps up buildings etc), and the
bird on the bike was inspired by Dr Seuss.
The painting that Luke travels into, as we see it on pages
22, 23, has been painted with oil paint, crayon and watercolour.
This picture had the work of Jackson Pollock as its starting
point, but could also remind us of many of the schools of
abstract painting.
The following spread, Luke on the bus, is oil paint, with
a bit of crayon on the top left corner (a spillover of the
painting in the previous spread).
Apart from the pen and ink and graphite used on Mr Barraclough
on page 29, the rest of the spreads have been painted in
oil paint.
Symbolism and themes
Bird imagery
There
is much use of bird symbolism throughout the book. In the
picture where Mr Barraclough is ranting at Luke for
painting a blue apple (page 7), there is a bird seen flying
away through the window. This is Luke's spirit being frightened
away by Mr Barraclough. The bars on the window are reminiscent
of prison bars, as are the bars on the window in the previous
spread. When Luke is painting his clock tower (pages 8, 9),
there is a bird on the roof gutter outside. His spirit has
tentatively come back while he paints. I've deliberately
posed a visual conundrum here - is the light that is glowing
on his face coming from outside (through the window), or
is it emanating from his painting?
Outside
the gallery (pages 12, 13), there is a statue of the phoenix
rising. There is a human figure as part of this
statue (at the back of it, where the wing meets the body).
This figure represents a person in torment, and there are
what might be seen as crosses in the twisted shapes around
the front of the body of the phoenix, representing death
(in this case the death of the world as Luke has been taught
to see it). The phoenix is struggling to rise from this.
Later on, in the bus scene (pages 24, 25), after Luke has
had his epiphany, we can see another statue of the phoenix
through the bus window. This one is about to triumphantly
fly free (notice the bird above Luke's head in the same spread
as he talks animatedly to the woman in front of him).
In the
first interior gallery scene Luke is standing beside a
painting by Clarra Bough. 'Clarra Bough' is an anagram
of Barraclough, and the painting is actually an abstracted
picture of Mr Barraclough squeezing Luke's spirit (the bird
again).

On the
following spread the bird imagery appears twice - in
the form of the
feather seen as part of the huge sculptural work seen through the archway at
the
end of the room, and in the Surrealist painting immediately before Luke. The
image in this painting could also be a phoenix. This birdman figure is dancing
on a giant egg - the egg representing fertility of mind and spirit - and it
is throwing glittering colours over buildings, changing them into something
magical (note the unchanged, 'real' city skyline behind the birdman). The feather
floating down to the outstretched hand in the sculptural piece is symbolic
of Luke' spirit, his creativity, gently floating into his own outstretched
hand as he enters this world.
Bird imagery appears three times in the kiosk scene (four
if you include the cooked chook!). The bird in the painting
seen just above Luke, is a wild pheasant from the Szechwan
province in China, called a monal (Lophophorus lhuysi).
I chose this particular bird because of its beautiful colours,
and it seemed appropriate to use a bird that really exists
in the world. It is pecking at some food on the ground, reflecting
not only Luke literally eating, but also the spiritual meal
he is having through his adventure in the gallery. I used
birds thematically in Mrs Millie's painting, which
is why there is an image from that book on the wall in this
picture (notice the bird in that particular image from Mrs
Millie). The emu sitting on the toilet is simply meant
to express the idea that reaching for enlightenment can also
include one's sense of humour. This is also a reference to
the sublime in the ordinary - and in a cheeky way to the
wonder of ordinary physical survival. For me one of the most
important parts of this particular spread, is Luke's eye.
If you follow his gaze (and he looks like he is staring intently
at something), he is looking at the emu. His gaze hasn't
quite made it to the angel, which is on top of the cistern.
For me the angel is a perfect symbol of the union between
the person and their free spirit (a combination of the human
and the bird), in other words, a symbol of enlightenment.
Luke has yet to experience the rest of his adventure in the
gallery before he can really 'see' the angel. In the final
illustration of the book we see by the symbolism of Luke's
shadow that he has 'found' his spirit. Mr Barraclough's shadow
has combined with his to make Luke's shadow appear as if
it - he - has angel's wings. This of course represents Mr
Barraclough's redemption as well (redemption in that he is
at last opening up to Luke's way of looking).
The bird
on the bike in the spread following ('After lunch.')
is again alluding to the humorous, to the absurd. Also, I
believe that once one has found the spirit, it is a bit like
riding a bike, one can't forget it. There is an alternative
to the bird imagery on this spread, in the butterfly emerging
from its chrysalis. The hands holding up the chrysalis represent
tolerance, an acceptance of difference (seen in the different
racial colourings). The edge of the butterfly wing on the
extreme right represents flight of the spirit in the same
way that the bird imagery elsewhere does.
Where
Luke is swinging through the painting, on pages 22, 23,
he has come a little closer to finding the angel within
him - his shadow has wings.
Back
in the schoolyard ('Even school looked..') one of the
buildings is in the process of becoming a phoenix. The gargoyles
are also taking flight. For Luke, the whole world is freeing
up, being reborn.

Motifs
Apart from bird imagery, there are two other symbolic motifs
used throughout the book. One is the motif of the outstretched
hand, and the other is that of the shadow. Often the use
of shadow has been combined with the bird imagery in a symbolic
way (as on pages 22, 23 and 32).
In the
opening spread (pages 4, 5), both the shadow and outstretched
hand motifs are combined. The shadow of Mr Barraclough's
hand is reaching out over the top of the boys, across the 'prison' window - Mr
Barraclough has complete control over the boys. All that
is, except Luke, who is a little apart from the boys, and
whose shadow is rising to meet Mr Barraclough's shadow.
On page
6 ('Every Friday afternoon.') Mr Barraclough reaches
out towards Luke, he wishes to control him too, but can't,
and so shakes his fist in frustration.
The illustration
on page 7 combines shadow - Mr Barraclough's
shadow towering above Luke's shadow, threatening - and the
outstretched hand, again Mr Barraclough's hand (seen in the
shadow) is also threatening.
Luke's shadow on pages 10, 11 is bending, leaning in a submissive
way to the shoulder of that of Mr Barraclough, which towers,
dominating Luke's shadow. Luke hasn't given in though, as
will be seen in other uses of symbolism on this spread (see
below, in Other symbolism).
For the first time we see a positive symbol of the outstretched
hand in the statue in front of the gallery on page 12. These
hands are reaching to the sky, towards freedom (alluding
to the symbol of flight).
The very
first image we have of Luke (page 5) shows him to be a
bit carefree - he is dropping his bag and dashing
to join the other boys for a class photo. I drew him this
way to show that his spirit is in conflict with Mr Barraclough's
way of doing things (all the other boys look subdued, beaten).
In all of the following spreads until pages 14, 15, Luke,
however, looks pensive, submissive. When he is in the gallery,
and a new world is opening up to him, he looks different.
For the first time, he is reaching out, unafraid. His pose
in the spread on pages 14, 15 mimics that of Mr Barraclough
in the abstract painting beside him. There is a difference
in the reasons for their similar stances, however, in that
Mr Barraclough is reaching up to crush the small bird (Luke's
spirit), whereas Luke is reaching out towards his enlightenment.
The artwork he is experiencing is about domesticity - all
objects and images that Luke will have seen in his everyday
life. He is beginning to see that there is richness and beauty
even in the ordinary, the everyday. (I tried to give him
the quality of a delicate butterfly, unfolding itself for
the first time - this idea subsequently gave me the idea
of using the butterfly symbolism on page 21).
On pages
16, 17 ('Luke wondered what.here') there are four
uses of the outstretched hand motive; one in the surrealist
painting, one in the huge hand sculpture with feather, one
in the nude painting, and one in the minotaur sculpture.
The minotaur is inviting Luke further into the gallery (in
the story of the minotaur, when one enters the labyrinth,
one never comes back - Luke is entering a world from which
there will be no going back for him). I have used light,
as the opposite to shadow, in a similarly symbolic way in
this spread. The sculptural work of the hand and feather,
symbolising Luke's returning spirit, is veiled in an ethereal
light. The feather - Luke's creativity - looks as if it has
dropped directly out of the light.
The outstretched
hand motif appears on pages 20, 21 ('After
lunch..to look at'), with Luke reaching up to the painting,
and with the hands holding up the chrysalis. Luke, you will
have noticed from previous spreads, is left-handed. Here,
he is pointing with his right hand. His multi reflected image
on the left hand page of this spread makes him appear to
be pointing with his left hand. All together, the images
of Luke and his reflections, represents his left/right brain
thinking as merging - in fact, for Luke all of reality is
merging - in the following page he has become one with the
painting.
Other symbolism
As well
as the use of recurring motifs in the expression of the
deeper themes of the book, Luke's awakening to the
power of his own creativity, and his relationship to Mr Barraclough
are shown through other ways in the illustrations. I began
the book in graphite, pen and ink and watercolour wash to
create a slightly 'old fashioned' and dull, colourless look - representing
the repressed and tightly controlled world of Mr Barraclough.
There is symbolism in the media in this respect only - I
have tried to retain a looseness of style - a balance between
rigidity and flow - that will keep the reader turning the
pages. After Luke has entered the world within the art gallery,
colour gradually seeps into him as his battered spirit slowly
draws energy from what he sees around him. The painting style
of the figure of Luke himself, becomes looser after he has
entered the gallery, and continues to broaden throughout
the book, even after his image no longer has any pen rendering
on it at all. I ceased using pen on Luke in the spread on
pages 22, 23, as this is the moment in the story when he
has finally completely broken free of his former constraints.
On pages
10, 11 ('when Mr Barraclough saw.'), I have posed
the two characters as if they are boxers in a fight. Although
Luke looks beaten, there is something deep within him that
wants to fight. When he is walking towards the gallery (next
page), he is cupping the knuckles of one hand in the other,
the way fighters do.
As Luke
journeys into the gallery, time ceases for him. This is
reflected in the sculptural piece involving the piano
(page 16, 17 'Luke wondered what. were here'). The clock
face in this work has no arms. Time cannot be read here.
I have devised this particular piece around music because
music is so important in my own life.
Elements
of the spread showing Luke racing back into the classroom
after his trip to the gallery (pages 28, 29), reflect
the now changed nature of the relationship between Luke and
Mr Barraclough. Luke is running, but also looks as if he
has just kicked a football (which Mr Barraclough has just
caught - ie the melon). Luke is now full of confidence and
has well and truly booted the ball where he wants it to go!
© 2001
Matt Ottley
|