|
Curriculum Support Home | |
|
NSW Department of Education and Training
Raps and book raps
Raps and book raps banner
 

Raps Home

|

Raps archive

|
|

Contacts

|

School Libraries and Information Literacy |
Spacer
 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

whalerider05_rap reply to BCS Year Niners Part 2



Part 2

Do you think camera angles are important in documentaries?

Yes, I do. Camera angles – like all film techniques – are as important in documentary films as in all films. A camera angle can help orient audiences and if they don't know where they are or which direction they are supposed to be looking in, they can feel confused. And once audiences feel confused they tend to stop being interested in the story (or narrative).

There's also an artistic aspect to this. If all films – doco or drama – used just one angle, it would probably be quite boring to look at. This is, in fact, a technique that has been used by some artistic filmmakers (we call them 'art-house films') – the New York artist/filmmaker Andy Warhol is one example -  but they are doing to this make a point about point of view, perspective and art rather than tell a story as most docos and drama films do.

A documentary involves the use of narrators, music, speech & special Effects etc in order to captivate the viewer & expand their knowledge. Does that make a Documentary a form of drama simply extended by fact. What do you think of this?

Or maybe dramas are forms of documentary simply extended by fiction? After all, the very first films that were made in France in 1895 were all early types of the documentary.

Not all documentaries, by the way, use narrators, special effects, and music (I assume you mean non-diegetic music? – if you haven't come across this term, ask you teacher!) I am not sure what you mean by 'speech' – can you explain? In the 1960s and 1970s there was a trend for a documentary genre called 'observational' or 'fly on the wall' that didn't use any of these additional film techniques. I was believed that if it didn't, the documentary would get closer to 'reality'. But doco filmmakers now realise that a documentary can only ever represent (ie "re-present") reality and it is just as much an art form as a drama so this genre is no longer very fashionable.

In the mid 1990s, a group of Danish filmmakers thought that drama films shouldn't have narration, music, special effects, etc (They called themselves DOGMA). Lars von Trier is the best known.  Their films are very arty and quite interesting although never hugely popular.

[End of Part 2 – see next email for Part 3]

Jane Mills
Associate Research Fellow: Australian Film, Television & Radio School;
Series Editor, Australian Screen Classics (Currency Press/ScreenSound).
27 Dudley Street, Bondi, NSW 2026.
Tel: (61) 02 9300 8836
jane.mills1@bigpond.com

 
Translated Documents arranged by Language