|
Curriculum Support Home | |
|
NSW Department of Education and Training
Raps and book raps
Raps and book raps banner
 

Raps Home

|

Raps archive

|
|

Contacts

|

School Libraries and Information Literacy |
Spacer
 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

whalerider05_rap reply to Andrea & Erin



Questions for Jane Mills by andrea and erin (big fans)

Hello there Andrea and Erin,

*Do you map out techniques prior to filming?

Absolutely – although this doesn't mean doco filmmakers, like drama filmmakers, don't do something different (add a wide shot or suddenly realise that a tilt up to the sky and then down again might be helpful for the editor to do a dissolve-type transition, for example) when we're actually filming on location. Or don't do something - usually because there's no time: perhaps because the person being filmed just can't wait for the filmmakers to do additional shots.

Most filmmakers write out a shot-list or draw each shot in a story board in advance. I recommend a shot-list for doco filmmakers. This saves time (very precious - and expensive on a professional production) and also helps as a checklist while on location to make sure we get all the shots we think you need.

I don't include much, if any, information about editing techniques in the script or in the shot-list as you need to see the filmed material first. The editor will often comes up with lots of brilliant and imaginative ideas and it's best to give them a free hand.

*Which techniques aare your signature peices?

I don't think I have any. Although, thinking about this a bit more, most of my documentary films have been about human rights subjects and also about filmmakers, so I have tended to use lots of archive footage and also extracts from feature films.  I love documentary films like this.

What makes a film identifyably yours?

These last two questions fall into an area of screen studies called "auteur theory". This is the French word for "author" and is a fascinating area to study.  I am always interested to discover (and a bit shocked, I confess!) how few (if any) of my students can name the director of a film they liked. This includes the teachers I train, as well as the school students I teach.  Whereas many of us in the film industry and who also teach screen studies will go to see a film only because of the director – or sometimes the cinematographer who obviously also has a big artistic say. For me, for example, one of the reasons I went to see "Rabbit-Proof Fence", apart from the story which I was very interested in, was because of the cinematographer (Chris Doyle). I was not a big admirer of the director (Phil Noyce) – tho I think he did a very good job on this film.

I will definitely be going to the next film that Niki Caro makes as I thought she was terrific director for Whale Rider.

Why do you think most people know the name of the author who wrote a book, but not the name of the director of a film – the director is the person who (usually) has the most creative input in a film. Can you name the director of the last film you saw?

I would say of my own films that the content is what made them identifiably mine – as I said, issues of human rights (including one film about torture for Amnesty International) and also films about filmmakers and filmmaking.

Hope to hear from u soon

Good to be in touch – I hope this was useful – and interesting.

Best wishes,

Jane
Jane Mills
Associate Research Fellow: Australian Film, Television & Radio School;
Series Editor, Australian Screen Classics (Currency Press/ScreenSound).
27 Dudley Street, Bondi, NSW 2026.
Tel: (61) 02 9300 8836
jane.mills1@bigpond.com

 
Translated Documents arranged by Language